‘When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of all revolutionary parties; at the same time, when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse.’

‘You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are disturbers. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. We have been at the bottom not merely of the latest great war but nearly all your wars, not only of the Russian but of every other major revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it.’

'A Real Case Against the Jews,' Marcus Eli Ravage, The Century Magazine, January 1928, Vol. 115, No. 3 pp. 346-350. Part 2 appeared in the following issue, pp.476-483.

1. The Biological Analogy

Richard Dawkins provides several examples of how cunning parasites can be, and how easy it is to be fooled. The sophistication of some ant species makes the cuckoo look like a novice. He describes a parasitic ant which invades a neighbouring colony, seeks out its queen, climbs on top of it and methodically gnaws off its head. Having usurped the position at the top of this social hierarchy, the alien queen produces eggs which are tended by the invaded colonies' workers, and new queens then go off to invade other colonies.

Even this strategy has been improved upon by another ant species. To quote The Selfish Gene, p. 252 (Dawkins is here referring to the founder of sociobiology, Edward Wilson):

‘But sawing off heads is a bit of a chore. Parasites are not accustomed to exerting themselves if they can coerce a stand-in. My favourite character in Wilson's The Insect Societies is Monomorium santschii. This species, over evolutionary time, has lost its worker caste altogether. The host workers do everything for their parasites, even the most terrible task of all. At the behest of the invading parasite queen, they actually perform the deed of murdering their own mother. The usurper doesn't need to use her jaws. She uses mind-control. How she does it is a mystery; she probably employs a chemical, for ant nervous systems are generally highly attuned to them. If her weapon is indeed chemical, then it is as insidious a drug as any known to science. For think what it accomplishes. It floods the brain of the worker ant, grabs the reins of her muscles, woos her from deeply ingrained duties and turns her against her own mother. For ants, matricide is an act of special genetic madness and formidable indeed must be the drug that drives them to it. In the world of the extended phenotype, ask not how an animal's behaviour benefits its genes; ask instead whose genes it is benefiting.’

‘We shall drive the Christians into war by exploiting their national vanity and stupidity. They will then massacre each other, thus giving room for our own people.’ Rabbi Reichorn in Le Contemporain, July 1, 1880

The Magen Dawid (the Shield of David) is a hexagram formed by the combination of two equilateral triangles and is used as a symbol of Judaism. It is placed upon synagogues, sacred vessels and the like, and was adopted as a device by the American Jewish Publication Society in 1873.

This symbol does not date back to David and Solomon as a symbol of Israel, but is a symbol used for centuries for magic amulets and cabalistic sorcery. In reality, it is the Star of Rephaim, but many Christians, Jews and others believe it to be the "Star of David."

2. Loss of Jewish Worker Caste

Note that the Jews lost their peasantry (worker caste) around 1,000 AD. This is documented by Shahak in Jewish History, Jewish Religion, pp. 52-53 and is clearly evident today. Shahak is unable to explain how this change in Jewish social structure came about, but it is hypothesized that the evolution of the following traits is involved:

1. Love of being above someone (e.g. gloating);
2. Abhorrence of being looked down upon.

Jews appear to be capable of getting themselves appointed to government positions, elected onto academic editorial committees etc., without any formal role or qualifications.

After the Great War (1914-18) had come to an end, the distress prevalent in Eastern Europe induced large numbers of those of Jewish race to cross the German frontiers where a Herr Badt – himself a Jew – managed to obtain an official position authorising him to control all matters relative to immigration and naturalisation. He saw to it that those sharing his race secured easy access to Germany. A few statistics may be helpful to show the extent to which these non-Germans through mutual assistance gradually succeeded in spreading their influence upon important professions and in various allied domains. In reading these statistics it is important to remember that those of Jewish race formed just 1% of the population.

Jewish University Teachers: Berlin: Medicine 45%; Breslau: Arts 25%, Medicine 45%, Law 48%; Gottingen: Mathematics 34%, Medicine 34%, Arts 40%, Law 47%; Konigsberg: Arts 7%, Law 14%, Medicine 25%.

Lawyers (1928): Dortmund 29%; Hamburg 25%, Stuttgart 26%, Dusseldorf 33%, Karlsruhe 36%, Beuthen 60%, Frankfurt 64%, Stettin 36%.

Lawyers (1933): Berlin 55%, Berlin Chamber of Attorneys 66%, Breslau 67%.

Medical Practitioners (1928): Wiesbaden 20%, Karlsruhe 26%, Cologne 27%, Mainz 30%, Gotha 31%, Beuthen 36% Berlin 52%. Berlin Hospitals: Moabit 56%, Friedrichshain 63%, Neukolln 67%.

The Stock Exchange. Committees on the Berlin Stock Exchange: Stocks and Shares 69%, Metal Exchange 83%, Produce Exchange 75%, Futures 83%, Administration 80%. Official List 87%. In 1928 it was revealed that just 15 Jews between them had occupied 718 board positions and of leading positions in industry there were ten Jews to every five non-Jews.

Leading Positions in Commerce: Berlin 49.4%, Frankfurt 48.9%, Cologne 49.6%, Breslau 57.1%.

Employed as Workers: Berlin 2.4%, Frankfurt 1.9%, Cologne 2.9%, Breslau 1.8%.

‘The Jew alone regards his race as superior to humanity, and looks forward not to its ultimate union with other races, but to its triumph over them all and to its final ascendancy under the leadership of a tribal Messiah.’ Goldwin Smith, Professor of Modern History, Oxford University, in Nineteenth Century, October 1881

3. Control of the Media. Examples. Use of Women

Jews employ the same strategy as Monomorium santchii by their control of the media. For the facts about the enormous Jewish influence in television, films, newspaper publishing etc. in America see the National Vanguard publication Who Rules America?, in Britain the BNP publication The Mind-Benders.

Using this control they define fashions and promote mores which derogate those who seek to preserve Occidental culture. The policy, specifically, is to stigmatize potential or actual leaders (of thought or action) and manipulate others to attack them.

As one example of that influence the present writer, Simon Sheppard has, merely for expressing opinions, been beaten up, prosecuted under the Public Order Act, endured numerous other forms of harassment, been banned from every public library in his home town of Hull and also banned from:

Although publishers in the Hull area can be counted on one hand, in the several years the Heretical Press has been in existence there has been no review of any HP publication in any local newspaper. The Heretical Press was excluded from a list of Hull websites maintained by the local telephone company. Thus the vast majority of people simply do not know that the Heretical Press exists, just as they do not know that another side exists to the Holocaust story. If any pages on this website tend to forthrightness, it is a completely natural reaction to the dishonest and underhand methods which are being used to suppress the truth.

It hardly needs stating that most people, when faced with such determined opposition, would choose to "bend with the wind" for an easy life. This is, perhaps, why leaders are such a threat. Other Nationalists, Revisionists etc. have had similar experiences:

Thousands of men are imprisoned unjustly because their instinct to rebel is valid but they are denied the information they need to direct their rebellion constructively. Consistently 97% of the prison population is male.

Note that Jews promote feminism via the media, particularly by the use of artificial media role models (AMRM's: empowering females to further act against males by giving them dishonest stereotypes to emulate is another form of Malign Encouragement). Like supports like; females conspire (act together); ‘the gene is selfish.’ Because of their emotional and impressionable natures women are a complete pushover for Jews to manipulate, so it is in the Jewish interest to deliver as much power to them as possible. Jews support women and women support Jews; but while females' optimal policy is Disguised Defection, the most advantageous policy for Jews is Disguised Invasion.

Due to the Jewish promotion of women we have the situation (in Britain at least) in which women incapable of repairing a bicycle puncture are driving around in fashion wagons chatting on mobile telephones while millions of their menfolk are unemployed. Big Sister's policy is to derogate, assault, stigmatize, reduce to poverty, drive to suicide, deprive of medical treatment, refuse compensation for criminal attacks, silence and, if possible, imprison any Occidental male who threatens to expose their cosy parasitic scams.